The introduction of Section 43B(h) by the Finance Act, 2023 has significantly altered the tax treatment of payments made to Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs). Effective from Assessment Year 2024-25, businesses following the mercantile system of accounting must pay closer attention to payment timelines prescribed under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006.
What appears to be a simple amendment has substantial implications for tax deductions, working capital management, vendor relationships, and year-end tax computations. Many taxpayers either overlook the provision altogether or mistakenly apply it to transactions that are not covered.
Section 43B of the Income-tax Act allows certain expenses as deductions only when they are actually paid, irrespective of the accounting method followed by the taxpayer.
Clause (h), inserted through the Finance Act, 2023, extends this principle to payments due to Micro and Small Enterprises.
The provision states that any amount payable to a Micro or Small Enterprise beyond the time limit specified under Section 15 of the MSMED Act shall be allowed as a deduction only in the year in which the payment is actually made.
In essence, delayed payments to eligible MSME suppliers can result in postponement of tax deductions.
The applicability of Section 43B(h) is linked directly to Section 15 of the MSMED Act, 2006.
If there is a written agreement between the buyer and the supplier, payment must be made on or before the agreed date. However, the agreed credit period cannot exceed 45 days from the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance of goods or services.
In the absence of a written agreement, payment must be made within 15 days from the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance.
Failure to comply with these timelines triggers the provisions of Section 43B(h).
The provision applies only when payments are due to registered Micro or Small Enterprises.
Therefore, obtaining and maintaining supplier-wise Udyam Registration details has become a crucial compliance requirement.
No.
This is one of the most misunderstood aspects of Section 43B(h).
The provision does not permanently disallow an expense merely because payment was delayed beyond 15 or 45 days. Instead, it postpones the deduction to the year in which actual payment is made.
Suppose a supplier raises an invoice in April 2025 and the payment is made in December 2025.
Although the payment may exceed the permissible credit period under the MSMED Act, the payment has still been made within the same financial year.
Since accrual and payment occur in the same previous year, the deduction remains available in that year itself.
No disallowance arises.
Assume an invoice is raised in January 2026 and remains unpaid as on 31 March 2026, despite crossing the prescribed payment period.
In this case:
Therefore, Section 43B(h) primarily impacts year-end outstanding dues to Micro and Small Enterprises.
A special feature of Section 43B(h) is that it does not enjoy the benefit available to most other clauses of Section 43B.
Under the general proviso to Section 43B, several expenses can still be claimed as deductions if they are paid before the due date of filing the income tax return under Section 139(1).
However, this relaxation specifically excludes clause (h).
If an MSME payment remains unpaid as of 31 March and crosses the prescribed MSMED timeline:
This makes year-end planning particularly important for businesses dealing with MSME vendors.
Apart from the income-tax implications, delayed payments attract interest under the MSMED Act.
When payment is delayed beyond the statutory period, the buyer becomes liable to pay compound interest with monthly rests at three times the bank rate notified by the Reserve Bank of India.
This liability arises automatically under law, irrespective of whether the supplier specifically demands the interest.
Section 23 of the MSMED Act provides that such interest is not allowable as a deduction under the Income-tax Act.
Therefore:
This distinction is extremely important from a tax planning perspective.
Section 43B(h) itself does not prescribe any separate penalty.
However, if the disallowance increases taxable income and results in a tax shortfall, consequential liabilities such as interest under Sections 234B and 234C may arise.
Where taxpayers correctly disclose and report the disallowance, the provision generally does not lead to penalties for under-reporting of income.
To ensure smooth compliance with Section 43B(h), businesses should adopt the following practices:
Companies with outstanding MSME dues must also file MSME Form-1 with the Registrar of Companies as required under the Companies Act, 2013.
Section 43B(h) is not a penal provision; it is a timing provision. Its objective is to encourage prompt payments to Micro and Small Enterprises by linking tax deductions with actual payment.
Businesses should remember the following:
✔ The provision applies only to Micro and Small Enterprises.
✔ Medium Enterprises are outside its scope.
✔ Expenses are not permanently disallowed; deductions are merely postponed until payment is made.
✔ Amounts paid within the same financial year generally do not suffer disallowance.
✔ Year-end outstanding dues beyond the prescribed MSMED timeline can result in tax disallowance.
✔ Interest payable under the MSMED Act is permanently disallowed for income-tax purposes.
A robust vendor classification process and periodic monitoring of MSME payables can help businesses avoid unexpected tax adjustments and maintain compliance with both the Income-tax Act and the MSMED Act.
How can we help? *
