Flipkart ESOP Compensation: ₹11 Crore Payout – Salary or Capital Receipt?

Flipkart

In a landmark situation that could set a precedent for global tech employees, Flipkart employees received massive discretionary payouts after their ESOPs lost value due to a corporate restructure. But the key question remains—should such payouts be taxed as salary or treated as capital receipts?

Here’s a deep dive into the legal tangle and what it means for your ITR filing this season.

The Background: Flipkart, PhonePe & ESOPs

Employees of Flipkart were granted ESOPs by its parent company, Flipkart Pvt Ltd (FPS), based in Singapore.

Then came a major corporate development—PhonePe was demerged from Flipkart. This restructuring significantly eroded the valuation of the ESOPs that had been allotted to employees.

What followed was highly unusual: FPS voluntarily chose to compensate employees for the notional loss in ESOP value—even though there was no legal or contractual obligation to do so.

Flipkart

This wasn’t a token gesture. The payouts were substantial:

  • One employee received ₹76 lakh

  • Another received over ₹11 crore
    And this was for ESOPs that had not even been exercised.

The Central Tax Question

The real debate centers around this:
Is this payout taxable as salary (perquisite)? Or is it a non-taxable capital receipt?

Let’s examine both arguments.

Argument 1: It's Taxable Salary under Section 17(2)(vi)

Section 17(2)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 includes in salary the value of any specified security or sweat equity shares allotted or transferred, either directly or indirectly, to the employee by virtue of employment.

The Madras High Court held that this language is broad enough to include such discretionary payouts—even for unexercised ESOPs.
So, even though the ESOPs were not exercised, the court considered the payout a taxable perquisite, making TDS applicable.

Argument 2: It's a Non-Taxable Capital Receipt

However, both the Delhi High Court and Karnataka High Court disagreed. Their key observations:

  • The ESOPs were never exercised

  • No shares were transferred

  • The compensation was a voluntary, one-time goodwill gesture

  • There was no contractual right to this payout

As per these courts, the payout was not linked to any “perquisite” arising from employment but rather a capital receipt, not liable to income tax.

Hence, TDS should not have been deducted, and employees could be entitled to refunds.

Legal Conflict: Divergent High Court Views

This issue has now resulted in directly conflicting judgments:

  • Delhi HC (Sanjay Baweja case)

  • Karnataka HC (Manjeet Singh Chawla case)
        Versus

  • Madras HC (Nishithkumar Mehta case)

While the Delhi and Karnataka HCs protected employees from tax on unexercised ESOP payouts, Madras HC ruled such amounts are salary income and hence taxable.

This is not a case of differing interpretations—it’s a direct legal face-off.

What Should Flipkart Employees (and Others) Do Now?

If you’re one of the affected employees (or in a similar situation), here’s what you should consider:

  • If TDS was deducted, you may claim a refund while filing your ITR, based on Delhi and Karnataka HC rulings.

  • Maintain all documentation related to how the compensation was computed.

  • Stay tuned for further developments—Supreme Court intervention is likely, and its decision will provide final clarity.

Why This Case Has Wider Implications

This isn’t just about Flipkart.

Many global corporations grant ESOPs via offshore entities, and corporate restructuring events—like spin-offs, mergers, and demergers—can impact valuations. If companies begin issuing discretionary compensation for such value erosion, the tax treatment must be clearly defined.

With rising cross-border employment and stock-based compensation becoming the norm, this issue will only grow in relevance.

Key Takeaway

For now: Taxpayers who’ve received such ESOP-related payouts should evaluate legal precedents, maintain records, and consider seeking refunds if TDS has been deducted.

But keep in mind—this issue is headed for the Supreme Court. Until then, caution and awareness are key.

Related Post

image

CBDT to Display Foreign Assets & Overseas Income in AIS and Form 26AS

CBDT to Display Foreign Assets & Overseas Income in AIS and Form 26AS On 8 July 2026, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued a landmark directive (Order F.No.…
image

ITR-1 vs ITR-2 vs ITR-4 for AY 2026-27: How to Choose the Right Income Tax Return Form

ITR-1 vs ITR-2 vs ITR-4 for AY 2026-27: How to Choose the Right Income Tax Return Form Filing your Income Tax Return (ITR) begins with one critical decision—selecting the correct…
image

Who Qualifies as a Relative Under the Income-tax Act, 1961?

Who Qualifies as a Relative Under the Income-tax Act, 1961? The term "relative" may appear straightforward, but under the Income-tax Act, 1961, it does not have a single universal definition.…

Book A One To One Consultation Now
For FREE

How can we help? *