North eastern states observe over 30% increase in Apr-Jul GST gathering

North eastern states registered more than 30 percent increase in GST collection during the initial four months of the current financial 2019-20, substantially more than the increased seen in bigger manufacturing states. Development in Goods and Services Tax (GST) collection recorded by a most of the seven sister states is more than three times the national average of 9 percent.

In absolute terms, the total tax collection during April-July of this financial year rise to Rs 3.56 lakh crore, according to the information access by .

Among the north eastern states, Nagaland registered highest increase of 39 percent at Rs 393 crore during April-July period, the information uncovered.

It was trailed by Arunachal Pradesh with 35 percent increase at Rs 514 crore and Sikkim with 32 percent increase to Rs 370 crore.

While Meghalaya timed a increase of 30 percent in GST collection at Rs 680 crore, Mizoram’s development was a bit lower at 27 percent with Rs 350 crore collection.

The laggard states of Tripura and Manipur also registered 16 percent development, more than twofold of large industrial states like Maharashtra, Haryana and Gujarat.

Out of 37 states and union territories, Delhi, Lakshadweep and Puducherry enrolled de-growth of 2 percent, 17 percent and 8 percent resp.

GST gathering of Delhi declined to Rs 12,700 crore during April-July 2019, contrasted with little under Rs 13,000 crore a year prior.

As indicated by specialists, Delhi has been unfavorably hit as the tax exchange on central sales tax (CST) has finished. Before, Delhi had a lower CST of 1 percent, inciting numerous organizations to dispatch products from the union territory by locating their offices here.

Large states like Maharashtra and Gujarat recorded a solitary digit growth of 6 percent in GST collection. Punjab timed 7 percent development, while Haryana’s development was at 9 percent.

Tamil Nadu and Karnataka recorded 10 percent and 11 percent development in GST growth, resp.

In contrast, consuming states like Bihar, Odisha, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh are faring superior to the industrial states with double digit growth.

Contact Certicom Consulting for more information or in case of any queries.

Are you having Missing Invoices in Your GSTR 1?

As registered taxpayers, elements need to file different returns based for their tendency of business and the kind of registration received. Returns filing under GST is frequently seen as a complex activity and one of the major reasons is the cross-referencing of the information filed by taxpayers in different returns.

The full rollout of GST return filing procedure was conceded by virtue of technical reasons and absence of insufficient preparedness in the market. As decided in the GST Council meeting, the return procedure will be rearranged and trial run according to the new streamlined return procedure will be accessible soon on GST Portal. The prototype of new streamlined return is also accessible on GST Portal.

According to the present process, GSTR 1, GSTR 3B, GSTR 4 and GSTR 6 are the returns which spread the majority taxpayers including standard taxpayers, composition vendors, and Input Service Distributors. There are some more returns for different taxpayers and explicit situations.

The interrelationship between GST returns

While all the returns are not executed, inside the returns that are active, the details are interlinked. Give us a chance to comprehend in detail the interchange between the information filed by different taxpayers considering

GSTR 1 – The monthly return (quarterly) containing the details of outward supplies made during the period. The outward supplies made to enrolled counterparties for example B2B sales are to be accounted for at invoice level while different categories, for example, intra-state sales to unregistered parties, nil, excluded, and so on are accounted for as aggregate values.

GSTR 6 – The monthly return for Input Service Distributors (ISD) comprising of B2B buys which stream from GSTR 1 of providers and distribution of ITC.

GSTR 3B – It is self-declaration by a taxpayer about tax liability happened and ITC claimed for the month.

What action needs to take in case you missed invoices while filing GSTR 1

In case you overlooked or missed to upload and save few of your invoices for GSTR 1 then it is critical to incorporate those invoices in GSTR 1. But, after submission of GSTR 1, it isn’t permitted to make changes in filed/submitted GSTR 1 just as there is no understanding of reconsidered GSTR 1 under GST return process.

So in such cases, the invoices which you missed up a in current GSTR 1, should be considered in your up and coming filing of GSTR 1.

It ought to be noted that the genuine tax liability and payment, at present, is totally decided by data recorded in GSTR 3B. So regardless of whether you missed some of your invoices in GSTR 1, still you can consider those invoices while filing your GSTR 3B.

And if while filing GSTR 3B also, you missed or excluded those liability related missed invoices then in your coming filing of GSTR 3B, you have to consider those missed invoices related liability too.

GSTR 1 and E-Way bill Reconciliation

One progressively significant thing to take care and do pro-action of checking your invoices getting considered for E-way bill generation and same getting considered for GSTR 1 or not. So to reduce the likelihood of invoices getting missed in GSTR 1 is possible by utilizing this IRIS Sapphire element for example “GSTR 1 EWB Recon”.

IRIS Sapphire gives you facility of doing the compromise between documents for which E-way bills created and information uploaded for GSTR 1. And gives results like Invoices missed in GSTR 1, Invoices missed in E-way generation and Invoices which got considered in both for example GSTR 1 and E-way bill generation.

Contact Certicom Consulting for more details.

GST Council may become Strict to Rules to Control Tax Avoidance

Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council, the government indirect tax body, is set to find a way to curb tax evasion in its first meeting to be led by new finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman on June 21.

The government intends to build investigation on organizations amid lower-than-expected GST accumulations subsequent to handholding them through the initial two years of the tax change. The 35th gathering of the GST Council will seek to introduce consistence necessities, at first on huge businesses and in the end on all merchants to curb tax leakage.

The proposition before the board incorporate mandatory generation of e-invoicing by big companies, approval of e-way charges (electronic grants issued for the development of products) with the information created at toll squares and geo-tagging of companies, said an individual acquainted with the discussions in the council.

Generation of e-solicitations will improve straightforwardness of exchanges and go about as an additional layer of administrative oversight on transactions of large organizations.

One existing security include in the GST structure is the rebate for taxes paid on past exchanges in the value chain that forces buyers and merchants to keep a tab on one another. “E-invoicing on the assigned portal will be executed at first on organizations with a huge turnover, which will be indicated. When the system works, it very well may be stretched out to other people,” the individual refered to prior said on state of anonymity. This is probably going to be constrained to business-to-business exchanges at first.

Specialists said the advantages of the tax reform would now begin getting visible. “In the pre-GST time, the common man was utilized to a lot higher taxation rate because of cascading impact of taxes. Presently it has descended. Since the initial time of disturbance is finished, the advantages of liberal and nominal tax rates will collect to the economy in the coming years. The products of indirect tax expense change will be felt sooner rather than later,” said V Lakshmi Kumaran, managing partner at Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan Attorneys, a law office.

A genuine tax avoidance worry that tax experts have been thinking about is the different utilization of e-way bills produced for transportation of goods to suppress the real estimation of the supply of things. Approving e-route bills with the data produced by radio-frequency distinguishing proof empowered vehicles’ payments at toll squares is required to curb this practice, said the individual.

Geo-labeling of organizations for GST compliance will take implementation exercises under the circuitous tax framework to the following level. At present, the ministry of corporate affairs(MCA) is executing a geo-tagging plan for organizations went for recognizing each active company and the general population behind them. Pooling the geo-labeling data accessible from the MCA database with the information produced by indirect tax specialists will help in confirming the credentials of various parties to an exchange.

However, all measures to improve consistence will be executed uniquely in a slow manner, beginning with the biggest companies. The slow recalibration of the tax system is intended to keep away from a kickback that the tax change had seen following its rollout two years prior, constraining the chamber to concede expense form documenting due dates a few times and incidentally suspend a portion of the wellbeing highlights of the new system.

With revenue receipts below targets, the central government, which has the Constitutional commitment to repay states for their income deficiency in the initial five years of GST usage, and states that stress over loss of income in the consequent years are keen to gradually increase enforcement measures. No enormous tax rate cut is likely in the forthcoming meeting of the council.

Visit Certicom for more detailed information.