Relaxation and clarity expected in Budget 2020 on capital gains tax

Relaxation and clarity expected in Budget 2020 on capital gains tax

In order to encourage small taxpayers to invest in the stock market, the government may consider raising the Rs 1 lakh limit to tax long-term capital gains from the transfer of such equity shares and equity-oriented funds units.

The aspirations of individual tax-payers are strong with the annual budget around the corner. Given the recent decline in corporate tax rates, individual taxpayers still expect tax rate cuts and relaxations to come their way.

Long-term capital gains on the selling of stock shares and equity-oriented fund products. The recent years have seen reforms in the taxation of capital gains that have raised the tax burden on individual taxpayers. For example, for transactions made on or after April 1, 2018, the long-term capital gains (LTCG) exceeding Rs 1 lakh on the selling of equity shares and equity-oriented funds units on which Securities Transaction Tax (STT) is paid, previously tax-exempt, is taxed at 10 percent.

In addition, the Government may also consider specifying a holding period (i.e. 5 years) and, where such shares or units are transferred after the specified holding period, long-term capital gains may be considered exempt.

Time limit for completion of construction under sections 54 and 54F

In the case of immovable property, a welcome step would be to increase the time limit for building house property to use exemption under sections 54 and 54F. The cap is actually to build a new house within three years from the date of selling the old one. In many cases, however, building completion takes longer.

In spite of this, to avoid taxpayers ‘ suffering due to loss of exemption due to the failure to finish construction, the time limit for building a house under section 54 and section 54F could be extended to 5 years. This is in accordance with the time limit for the deduction of interest on housing loan provided for under section 24 as amended by the Finance Act, 2016.

First-year for calculating the indexed cost of acquisition

According to the joint reading of Explanation, 1(b) to Section 2(42A) and Section 49(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the holding period of the previous owner shall be considered in deciding the holding period of the capital assets obtained by the taxpayer through certain acquisition methods, such as gifts or inheritances. However, as provided for in Section 49(1), the expense of purchase about such properties shall be determined based on the previous owner’s costs.

However, based on a literal reading of the Explanation to Section 48, it is possible that the indexing cost inflation index for such long-term capital assets should only be considered from the date on which the taxpayer first held the asset (and not from the date on which the previous owner first held that asset).

 

Latest Updates
 
  • Business Transformation: Takeover of Proprietorship by Private Limited Company
    Business Transformation: Takeover of Proprietorship by Private Limited Company The entrepreneurial journey often begins with a sole proprietorship, offering simplicity and direct control. However, as your business grows, the limitations of this structure may become apparent. Converting your proprietorship into a private limited company can unlock numerous benefits, including limited liability, […]
  • Navigating GST Changes: 5 Essential Updates on E-Way Bill and E-Invoice
    Navigating GST Changes: 5 Essential Updates on E-Way Bill and E-Invoice As we step into the new financial year 2025-26, businesses must gear up for key compliance changes in GST, particularly concerning E-Invoicing and E-Way Bills. These aren’t just procedural formalities—they’re critical documents that validate tax liability and the movement of […]
  • Pros and Cons of Presumptive Taxation Scheme for Professionals
    Pros and Cons of Presumptive Taxation Scheme for Professionals To reduce the compliance burden for small professionals, the Income Tax Act introduced the Presumptive Taxation Scheme under Section 44ADA. This scheme is especially useful for professionals like doctors, lawyers, architects, engineers, and others specified under Section 44AA. What is Section 44ADA? […]
  • Understanding Form 3CD Amendments: What Changed from April 1, 2025
    Understanding Form 3CD Amendments: What Changed from April 1, 2025 The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), via Notification No. 23/2025 dated March 28, 2025, has introduced key amendments to Form 3CD under the Income-tax Rules, 1962. These changes come into effect for all tax audit reports signed on or after […]
  • GST Compliance Checklist for Financial Year 2025-26
    GST Compliance Checklist for Financial Year 2025-26 Strategic Review & Action Plan for Businesses As the new financial year 2025–26 begins, businesses must undertake a comprehensive introspection of their GST compliance framework. This includes both substantive law changes and procedural reforms. With several amendments becoming effective from April 1, 2025, aligning […]

Relaxed norms on Angel Tax – An insufficient offering

Introducing:

1. Capital implantation is one of the key supporters of the development of a Company. It turns out to be considerably progressively vital for new companies and new business adventures where one of the real wellsprings of money comes straight from loved ones who just wish to claim value to a restricted degree without picking up the board rights. With this foundation, it’s not hard to dressing why such value accomplices are called as Angel financial specialists. Actually no duty ought to be exacted on portion of offers, since the offers are made when they are distributed and not exchanged. Unexpectedly, Capital increase is exacted on ‘exchange’ of offers and not creation thereof.

An Angel practice could likewise offer ascent to a shrewd unfortunate behavior. As a misbehavior, Capital mixture in new Companies through value speculations could be instrumental available for use of unaccounted cash in the economy. To put a keep an eye on the age and flow of unaccounted cash, two parallel changes were made through Finance Act 2012 wherein two stipulations were presented in area 68 and segment 56(2)(viib) was presented.

Revision to Sec. 68 and presentation of sec. 56(2)(viib) their application

2. Area 68 applies on unexplained money credits in the books kept up by the citizen where such citizen can’t acceptably offer a clarification about the nature and wellspring of such credits. Through embeddings the two stipulations in area 68, the offer application and offer premium sums got will likewise be secured inside the ambit of the aforementioned segment. In any case, where the citizen properly fulfills the duty officer in regards to three parameters in connection to receipt of offer application/premium cash, such citizen can acquit itself from burden of segment 68 demand. The previously mentioned three parameters set up the character and reliability of the financial specialist and demonstrate the validity of the exchange.

Segment 56(2)(viib) is an enemy of maltreatment arrangement drafted to beat the dumping of money assets in generally less esteemed privately owned businesses by any inhabitant citizen. Where the deal thought gotten by a privately owned business surpasses the Fair Market Value (‘FMV’) of such organization, an assessment (prominently called Angel charge) is forced on the distinction between the two, burdened in the hands of recipient privately owned business. The FMV of such privately owned business is required to be registered as per valuation rule 11UA (2). The valuation rules limit the valuation technique to utilization of either ‘Book esteem’ strategy or Discounted Cash Flow Method (‘DCF’). A dealer investor’s valuation report is required to be acquired by the citizen, if DCF strategy for valuation is received.

Consequent advancements as to Angle Taxe

3. Hence, vide Finance Act 2016, segment 80IAC was presented accommodating full assessment exclusion for a long time in a square of 5 years on benefits earned by new companies that are consolidated between April 01, 2016 and March 31, 2019 and are additionally endorsed by Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP). An application in Form 1 should be recorded with the Inter-Ministerial board looking for endorsement for being qualified as a ‘start-up’. Despite the fact that the activity appeared boosting, yet the outcomes are a long way from accomplishing the ideal motivators for new businesses. Since the presentation of endorsement plot just a bunch of new companies have possessed the capacity to accomplish acknowledgment as a start-up.

Further, DIPP issued its Notification dated April 2018 for giving tax cut to qualified new companies who could apply in Form 2 for getting exception from area 56(2) (viib) of the Income-charge Act (Angel charge arrangement). Be that as it may, one of the pre-conditions for getting Angel charge exclusion was increasing Ministerial endorsement by recording Form 1 and being perceived as a Start-up. A few conditions were refered to for recording Form 2 including the total measure of paid-up offer capital of the candidate start-up after proposed issue of offers ought not surpass 10 crores, the normal returned pay of the speculator ought to be 25 lakhs or more in going before 3 years and the total assets ought to be 2 crores in going before year. Further, a valuation authentication from trader investor indicating the honest esteem was required to document Form 2.

As of late, DIPP issued another Notification dated January 16, 2019 wherein the preconditions of documenting Form 2 have been additionally changed wherein the point of confinement of a years ago returned pay of financial specialist has been upgraded from 25 lakhs to 50 lakhs joined with the prerequisite of total assets of 2 crores. The dealer financiers valuation report does not discover a spot in the refreshed Form 2 issued in the previously mentioned Notification by DIPP. The application gotten by DIPP will be sent to CBDT which will concede or decrease endorsement inside 45 days of receipt of such application.

Regardless of whether wanted outcomes can be accomplished?

4. DIPPs notice doesn’t get together to the desires for the partners at any dimension, aside from getting rid of the vendor broker’s valuation report necessity. In actuality, improving the total assets and returned pay criteria of proposed financial specialist have made the offering further stringent and hardened. The improved firmness probably won’t be of any great to the business, particularly when the earlier necessity of getting the start-up endorsed from Ministry is kept up all things considered. Out of all pre-conditions, the fundamental state of acquiring Inter-Ministerial Board’s endorsement is a tough assignment that debilitates a large portion of the new businesses in getting ready for acquiring a holy messenger charge exclusion in future.

Without the acknowledgment as a start-up, each privately owned business is at a danger of accepting notification testing their reasonable value and the report issued by shipper investor. So the effect of segment 56(2)(viib) is kept up in all its strength and no solid outcomes appear to be accomplished by DIPPs cluster of Notifications apparently attempted to give motivating forces and reliefs.

Striking a balance

5. With the above setting, the legislature ought to adequately attempt to strike a decent harmony between forcing limitations on stream of unaccounted cash and boosting new companies in the meantime. One of the approaches to accomplish it could be to connect the arrangements of area 68 with segment 56(2)(viib) wherein the precondition of applying Angel Tax would be as per the general inclination of AO on materialness of segment 68. As it were, the place the citizen can’t attractively clarify the nature and wellspring of offer application cash contributed, at exactly that point Angel assessment ought to be imposed in the hands of the beneficiary Company so as to check the dissemination of unaccounted cash. Along these lines, the current insuperable optional power in hands of the AO to challenge the valuations of new businesses can be contained and the level of abrasiveness of area 56(2)(viib) can be directed.