Budget 2022 revealed new income tax reforms.

Budget 2022 revealed new income tax reforms.

The government would allow a one-time window to remedy omissions in income tax filings (ITRs), according to Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman. Taxpayers will be able to file an amended return on payment of taxes within two years of the end of the relevant assessment year, according to a new tax law introduced by the Finance Minister.

1) ITR filing: Relief for taxpayers

According to FM, taxpayer have two years from the end of the relevant assessment year to file an updated ITR. According to the FM, this is a new provision that will ensure voluntary tax filing and reduce litigation.

“As a concept, trust-based governance is increasingly being included into income-tax legislation. If there are any errors or omissions, a new provision has been provided to file an amended return to modify and pay the applicable taxes, which must be done within two years of the relevant assessment year. Ritesh Kumar, Partner at IndusLaw, says, “It promotes trust-based governance.”

Read More…

[pt_view id=”baa39696xe”]

2) Digital asset proceeds are subject to a 30% tax.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has announced a 30% tax on virtual/digital asset revenues.

“Virtual digital assets are subject to a 30% tax. Other than acquisition costs, there are no deductions. There is no allowance for a set-off against other income. If a sale exceeds a specified threshold by 1%, tax withholding will be activated. Employer contributions to the National Pension System (NPS) were raised from 10% to 14% for state government employees, bringing them in line with central government employees. Non-government personnel are not eligible “Saraswathi Kasturirangan, Partner at Deloitte India, commented.

“Virtual digital assets (crypto): establishing a specific tax regime for virtual digital assets (such as crypto) while offering clarity is not what the industry expected.” “The 30% tax rate and set-off loss restriction is a pretty aggressive move in deterring crypto transactions,” stated Ritesh Kumar, Partner, IndusLaw.

3) Net Promoter Score

The maximum tax deduction for contributions to the NPS by state government employees has been increased from 10% to 14 percent.

“We have fully grasped the value of the most recent provisions for taxpayers. One excellent scheme is the tax deduction limit on the employer’s contribution to the NPS account of state government employees, which has been increased to 14 percent. And the new return filing provision is far better than the old one, with a maximum time limit of two years till the end of the assessment year. To make things even better, the tax benefits for startups have been extended for another year,” stated Amit Gupta, MD, SAG Infotech.

“Increasing the employer’s contribution to the NPS account of central and state government employees to 14 percent is a solid step toward easing the tax burden on employees.” The extending of the return filing deadline to two years would relieve the strain on assessors and ITOs. However, we had hoped that the budget will increase the standard deduction limit from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 1,00,000, and that WFH employees would receive special tax relief,” said Gaurav Kapoor, Director & Co-Founder, Fincorpit Consulting Private Limited.

4) Payments made for the transfer of digital assets will be subject to a 1% TDS.

Budget forecasts include changes to the GST and the reduction of import tariffs.

5) Only a 15% levy on long-term capital gains will be applied to all assets.

“Long term capital gains to be subject to surcharge solely at 15 percent for all assets as against graded surcharge. “At the moment, this is only available for listed shares and mutual fund units,” FM Sitharaman explained.

“At the moment, the surcharge on long-term capital gains on listed shares and equity funds is capped at 15%, but the surcharge on other LTCG is based on total income.” According to tax expert Balwant Jain, the FM has proposed a ceiling on all LTCG.

Relief from income taxes on Covid-19 treatment costs and compensation

“In terms of personal taxation, the budget doesn’t have much to offer.” Persons who got money for expenses related to Covid 19 treatment, on the other hand, have been granted relief. Similarly, money received by family members upon a person’s death will be exempt up to ten lakhs for family members,” according to tax expert Balwant Jain.

Persons with disabilities are eligible for tax assistance.

A differently-abled individual’s parent or guardian can enrol in an insurance plan for that person. Only if the lump-sum payment or annuity is accessible to the differently-abled person upon the death of the subscriber, i.e. parent or guardian, is the parent or guardian entitled to a deduction.

There may be times when differently-abled dependants require an annuity or lump sum payment, even if their parents or guardians are still alive. I suggest that annuity and lump-sum payments to differently-abled dependents be made during the lifespan of the parents/guardians, i.e., when the parents/guardians reach the age of sixty.

The new income tax system should be made more appealing.

The new income tax system should be made more appealing.

Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman, the Finance Minister, added Section 115BAC into the Income-tax Act in the Union Budget 2020, allowing an individual or HUF to choose an alternative tax system. If key exemptions and deductions are forsaken, this alternative tax regime allows for lower tax rates. Even after promising lower tax rates, this new system fails to entice taxpayers. Non-residents have benefited more from this regime because they are not entitled to significant deductions and exemptions.

The salaried class will no longer be entitled to the normal perks and exemptions such as Leave Travel Concession, House Rent Allowance, Standard Deduction of Rs. 50,000, and so on under the new system. They are unable to deduct mortgage interest and most standard deductions such as Section 80C, Section 80D, Section 80G, and Section 80TTA. To summarise, taxpayers who opt out of certain deductions and exemptions might benefit from lower income tax rates. It’s a scheme that’s conditional. In the old regime, there were four tax slabs, whereas there are seven in the new regime. For income surpassing Rs. 15 lakhs, both regimes continue to apply a 30 percent tax rate.

Read More…

[pt_view id=”baa39696xe”]

Indian taxpayers frequently invest in Section 80C tax-saving solutions in order to save money for retirement. In addition, following the COVID-19 outbreak, people have realised the value of medical insurance, which is deductible under Section 80D. Because these investing and savings tools are so common among taxpayers, they are eligible for deductions, which are no longer available under the new regime. The reliefs and exemptions that are lost in the alternative system offset the tax savings.

The new government appears to be more concerned with encouraging Indians to spend than than save. For this, the government must implement social security plans to encourage Indians to abandon their savings habits and spend more in order to live a respectable life with all of life’s amenities at a younger age.

The choice between two regimes is based on the specifics of each situation, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution. To determine whether option is more advantageous, taxpayers must calculate their tax liability under both scenarios. It must be determined based on the taxpayer’s income level, tax savings investments, deductions, and exemptions. Taxpayers who have a greater number of deductions and exemptions may continue to pay tax under the old system.

Many people have turned to the stock market in addition to their professions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the work-from-home culture. Futures and Options (F&O) trading profits and losses are always taxable under the heading ‘Profits and Gains from Business or Profession.’ As a result, they become taxpayers with a wage and a business.

The government has decided to levy a tax on ULIP investments over Rs 2.50 lakh

People with a company income are unable to switch to a different regime every year. The option can only be used once in the first year, but it is valid for all subsequent assessment years. To opt for the new system, they must submit Form 10-IE. In the case of persons with income from a business or profession, the ‘opt out’ from section 115BAC is only available once. He will also be ineligible to use the option under the section again unless he stops to carry on his business or profession after he opts out. As a result of these circumstances, business taxpayers are less likely to support the new system.

It is difficult for the average taxpayer to comprehend all of the nuances of tax law. As a result, the Finance Minister should make the parameters of the new system easier to understand so that taxpayers can select between the two possibilities. Furthermore, the new regime’s limits should be eased to allow taxpayers to claim at least common exemptions and deductions, making the new system more appealing to them.

Small and medium-sized taxpayers confront challenges under the GST framework.

Small and medium-sized taxpayers confront challenges under the GST framework.

1.REGISTRATION-RELATED ISSUE

We appreciate that the GSTN system has greatly enhanced the registration process over previous rules. KYC rules are reliable in determining a person’s legitimacy because of Aadhaar and PAN cards. Other documents may be taken into account in the same way. Minor inconsistencies have been known to cause registration applications to be refused. The following are some examples:

(a) Name or address discrepancy: In India, names and addresses are written in a variety of ways. There is no consistency. As a result, a person’s name in one document may differ from his or her name in other documents. Similarly, an address found in one document may not be identical in another. The Registering Officers regard it as a discrepancy in the application and automatically reject it. The registration should not be denied if the applicant is otherwise authentic.

(b) Proof of Business Location: India is known for its huge, undivided families, where family members and relatives live together under one roof. However, such a person may not be a member of the stated family in the traditional sense of the word. The property is in one person’s name, but the electrical bill is in another’s name. The requirements require a letter of authorization from the property owner or holder. However, many authorities demand that the rent agreement be registered; otherwise, registration will be denied. Furthermore, a rent agreement can be registered within four months of its completion. As a result, a registered rent agreement may not be required.

Related Article…

[pt_view id=”baa39696xe”]

(c) Due to a size restriction in the portal, the officer is unable to see the documents, resulting in the application being rejected: In typically, a Rent Agreement / Lease Agreement, or Ownership Document has a large number of pages (upto 50-100). However, while submitting said document at the time of registration on the GST Portal, the file size is limited to 2MB. It indicates that you can only upload files up to 2MB in size. Due to the file size restriction, a lower-quality file is uploaded to the GST portal, which is not fully viewable to the officer, prompting him to reject the application. The preservation of registration records is critical for the government. As a result, it is proposed that the size limit be increased to This will eliminate a large number of registration rejections that aren’t required.

(d) Documents requested by Officers in order to provide registration: That the GST Rule explicitly stipulates the list of documents to be filed for registration purposes. Further interpretation by the involved Officers is plainly outside their scope, and as a result, the tax payer is harassed, and the government’s income collection is compromised as a result of the delay in acquiring the registration.

2. ISSUES RELATED TO REGISTRATION CANCELLATION

For noncompliance, the GST authorities have the authority to cancel registration on their own. The primary reason for the cancellation of a substantial number of registrations is failure to file returns. The main reason for not being able to pay tax is that many small and medium-sized tax payers rely on recovery and have no alternative means of obtaining funds. Cancellation of registration not only puts them in more problems, but it also has a cascade effect on his consumers.

(a) Separate return filing and tax payment: ITC is not given until the government receives it. There is no revenue loss if returns are permitted without payment of tax. Return filing and tax payment should be viewed as two separate operations that are not related. The system may also allow for partial tax payment and payment in instalments. At the very least, the information about outward supply will be available for further action if returns are permitted without payment.

(b) No retroactive cancellation: Retrospective revocation of a tax payer’s registration certificate is unfair to the innocent and honest taxpayer. Because his consumers must be unaware of the cancellation. When the ITC is refused to him, the fact of cancellation becomes known to the consumer. He must suffer the consequences of the revocation of another tax payer’s registration. If the cancellation has a retroactive effect, the problem is exacerbated. In this instance, the innocent taxpayers are the ones who suffer the most.

(c) Financial stress during the covid period: Many small and medium tax payers are experiencing major financial difficulties throughout the covid period. The government is attempting to assist by providing financial aid. In such a case, cancellation of registration is counterproductive to the government’s current needs, which include the handholding of small and medium tax documents. He cannot afford to postpone or cease his operation, even if the registration certificate is revoked. Tax compliance is less vital than survival. This is a problem that primarily affects tax payers in the unorganised sector. They are only semi-literate and have no additional skills or sources of income. As a result, the cancellation of their registration certificate effectively forces them into the grey market.

3. PROBLEMS WITH INPUT TAX CREDIT:

Section 16 of the CGST/SGST Acts establishes time constraints for claiming and/or declaring external supplies required to claim ITC. They have proven to be a serious thorn in the side of company, resulting in significant additional costs and a cascade effect. It has engendered a great deal of hostility among honest tax payers.

(a) The six-month time limit may be lifted: Following a recent modification to Sec 16(2), a taxpayer cannot claim ITC unless it is represented in Form 2B. Cross-verification is particularly successful with the GSTN system, and it can rule out claim duplication. As a result, the six-month time limit may be eliminated entirely. It serves no use other than to deny ITC claims that are otherwise genuine.

(b) A 180-day time limit serves no useful purpose: the payment terms are set by the buyers. Payment periods sometimes surpass the 180-day maximum. In this instance, it is expected that the ITC will be reversed and applied to the outgoing tax. ITC must be reclaimed once payment has been made. The possibility of a post-sale discount or a mutually agreed-upon lower payment adds to the ambiguity; whether the provision applies in such a circumstance or not has to be determined in clear terms. This activity does not enhance tax income, but it does increase compliance costs and capital blockage. When there are a high number of transactions, keeping track of them is a difficult task.

When there are a high number of transactions, keeping track of them is a difficult task. Reversal and recapture of ITC is an useless process when the government has already collected the tax. It is wishful thinking to believe that individuals who delay payment of the principle amount will pay it to the supplier because they may have to reverse ITC at any point.

(c) The appropriate proviso in 16(2) should be deleted: We believe that the GST principle is very business friendly, but that many rules are unjust and unfair to honest tax payers, increasing their burden. If the above proposals are embraced, we are confident that the GST will be fair and just for honest tax payers.

(d) IGST Credit not reflected in Form-2B: The GSTN site does not capture or reflect auto-populated bill-of-entry data. As a result, taxpayers are having trouble obtaining an input tax credit. This requires an immediate solution, such as integrating IGST payments on imports to the GSTN portal.

4. PROBLEM WITH FILING A REVISED RETURN TO CORRECT ARITHMETICAL ERRORS

 Because GST was new, there were a number of unintended arithmetical errors made by taxpayers when filing GST Returns and complying with numerous rules such as E-way Bills, reporting B2B as B2C, reporting invoices to the incorrect GSTIN owing to a typographical error, and so on. As a result, we respectfully request that you allow us a one-time opportunity to correct any legitimate or inadvertent errors. It will assist all taxpayers in complying with the GST law as well as facilitating the free flow of ITC.

Expectations for Budget 2022: Increased standard deductions and income tax relief for saving for children’s education.

5. PROBLEM WITH FILING A REVISION PETITION BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER IN THE EVENT THAT THE FIRST APPEAL IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE:

It is true that the government has been unable to establish GST Appellate Tribunals around the country. If the Taxpayer’s First Appeal is denied for any reason, including default, he will have to appeal to the State’s Hon’ble High Court. Many small taxpayers are unable to afford the lawyer’s fees and expenditures. As a result, if the First Appeal is dismissed on limine, a provision may be provided in the interest of justice to file a Revision Petition before the Commissioner of the concerned State.

6. ISSUE RELATED TO THE FORMATION OF A ADVISORY COMMITTEE AT THE CIRCLE, RANGE, OR DIVISION LEVEL

A popular government is continually looking for flaws in the working system. As a result, advisory committee meetings at the Circle/Division/Range level were held at least twice a year in the past to learn about technical as well as other challenges experienced by Taxpayers. Information gathered from tax payers was compiled and posted on the Department’s website, and difficulties relating to various parts were eventually resolved. As a result, it is advised that the government restart the process of identifying and resolving the challenges that Taxpayers face at the grassroots level.