The emergence of Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs), such as cryptocurrencies and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), has redefined the global financial ecosystem. In India, the rapid growth of this sector has prompted swift legislative action to integrate VDAs into the tax framework. This blog provides a comprehensive overview of how VDAs are taxed under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Goods and Services Tax (GST), 2017, while also exploring the ongoing debate on the classification of VDA income.
The Finance Act, 2022 formally introduced VDAs into the tax net. Section 2(47A) of the Income Tax Act defines VDAs in broad terms to cover:
Any information, code, number, or token (excluding Indian and foreign currency) generated cryptographically, representing value that can be stored, traded, or transferred electronically.
Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and similar digital assets.
Any other digital asset notified by the Central Government.
Crypto-assets validated via distributed ledger technology (effective A.Y. 2026–27).
This inclusive definition ensures that the law remains relevant amid rapid technological advancements.
A dedicated regime for VDAs was established under Section 115BBH, featuring:
Flat 30% Tax Rate: Applicable to all VDA transfers, regardless of the holding period. This removes the distinction between short-term and long-term gains.
No Deductions: Apart from the cost of acquisition, no expenses (like mining costs, internet charges, or exchange fees) can be deducted.
No Loss Set-Off: Losses from VDA transfers cannot be set off against other income or carried forward.
To improve compliance and create audit trails, Section 194S introduced TDS obligations:
TDS Rate: 1% on consideration paid for VDA transfers.
Thresholds: ₹50,000 annually for specified persons (individuals/HUFs with turnover below limits) and ₹10,000 for others.
Responsibility: The payer (or crypto exchange, if used) must deduct and remit TDS.
An amendment to Section 56(2)(x) includes VDAs in the definition of property. Thus:
Gifts of VDAs exceeding ₹50,000 in aggregate are taxable as “Income from Other Sources.”
Exemptions apply for gifts received from specified relatives.
A major point of contention is whether VDA income should be treated as Capital Gains or Business Income.
Case for Capital Gains:
Most individual investors hold VDAs for appreciation, similar to stocks or real estate.
Judicial precedents (ITAT rulings) have classified VDA gains as capital gains.
VDAs qualify as intangible property under Section 2(14).
Case for Business Income:
Frequent, high-volume traders exhibit business-like activity.
Systematic and organized trading indicates commercial intent.
Infrastructure and resources dedicated to trading strengthen the case.
Professional Opinion: Classification should be case-specific, based on judicial principles. For long-term or casual investors, capital gains treatment is more appropriate, while frequent traders align better with business income. However, the flat 30% tax under Section 115BBH blurs the practical significance of this debate.
The GST Council has not yet issued specific guidelines for VDAs, but under existing law, the following interpretations arise:
VDA as Goods: VDAs likely fall under the definition of goods (movable property other than money and securities).
Trading Between Individuals: Direct peer-to-peer trading of VDAs may not attract GST.
Services by Exchanges: Exchange services such as wallet maintenance and trade facilitation are subject to 18% GST on fees/commissions.
HSN Code & Rate: Crypto sales may attract GST at 18% under HSN Code 960899 (miscellaneous articles).
Input Tax Credit (ITC): ITC may be claimed on GST paid for services like brokerage, consultancy, and software used in VDA transactions.
Mining: Mining as a business may be subject to GST if turnover exceeds ₹40 lakh, treated as supply of services.
The absence of detailed GST guidelines creates uncertainty in valuation, place of supply, and compliance requirements.
India’s taxation framework for VDAs is evolving. The current regime imposes a flat, high tax rate with limited deductions, ensuring revenue but discouraging investment. While the government aims to curb speculative trading, the lack of differentiation between types of VDA activities creates rigidity.
A more refined framework—similar to capital asset taxation with distinct rates for short-term and long-term holdings—could encourage stability and growth in the VDA ecosystem. Clear GST guidelines are also essential to avoid disputes and provide industry clarity.
In essence, India’s VDA tax regime reflects a balancing act: capturing revenue from an emerging asset class while attempting to regulate speculative activity. The next stage must focus on clarity, fairness, and fostering a sustainable digital asset market.
How can we help? *