The new income tax regime promises lower tax rates, a benefit that appeals especially to high-income earners looking to reduce their tax obligations. However, this benefit comes with a trade-off: reduced access to many traditional exemptions and deductions. Although taxpayers can choose between the old and new tax systems, many may not fully understand the long-term financial impact of switching to the new regime.
Introduced in the Financial Year (FY) 2020-21, India’s new income tax regime aims to streamline tax compliance, making it more efficient and user-friendly. Under the old system, individuals often had to seek professional help to navigate the numerous deductions and exemptions available to reduce their tax burden. By lowering tax rates and removing many traditional tax-saving provisions, the new regime simplifies the filing process for taxpayers and tax authorities alike. The government offers a choice between the old and new regimes, hoping that this autonomy will foster compliance.
The new tax regime introduces revised slabs and eliminates several common exemptions and deductions. Provisions like House Rent Allowance (HRA), deductions under Section 80C for investments, and Section 80D for medical insurance are no longer available. Unlike the old regime, which incentivizes savings through tax exemptions, the new regime offers lower tax rates, appealing to those who prefer simplicity over complex tax-saving strategies.
Each year, taxpayers can select the regime that best suits their financial goals, allowing flexibility in tax planning. The new regime may appeal to some due to its straightforward structure, while others may find that the deductions offered by the old regime provide better savings.
The new tax slabs, with rates ranging from 5% to 30%, aim to reduce tax burdens incrementally across income levels. In return, salaried employees forgo exemptions and deductions, such as the standard deduction, HRA exemptions, and Section 80C deductions for investments in life insurance, ELSS, and PPF. Medical insurance deductions under Section 80D are also excluded.
However, certain benefits, like contributions to the National Pension System (NPS) and employer contributions to the Employee Provident Fund (EPF), remain. Though limited, these provisions offer some relief, but the new structure requires salaried employees to rethink their tax planning.
The effects of the new regime vary depending on income level:
Low-Income Employees (income below INR 5 lakhs): For low-income earners, the new regime offers clear benefits, as reduced tax rates combined with a Section 87A rebate can result in little to no tax liability. With minimal need for exemptions, these individuals benefit from simplicity and a low tax burden.
Middle-Income Employees (income between INR 5 lakhs and INR 15 lakhs): For this group, the choice between the two regimes depends on financial strategy. Middle-income earners who use deductions like HRA or investments under Sections 80C and 80D may find more savings under the old regime. Conversely, those with fewer deductions may prefer the new regime’s reduced rates.
High-Income Employees (income above INR 15 lakhs): High-income earners used to claiming extensive deductions might experience a higher tax liability under the new regime due to the loss of high-value exemptions. For those with significant tax-saving investments, the old regime may still provide better savings.
When choosing between the regimes, salaried employees should consider factors such as annual income, investment extent, eligible deductions, and financial goals.
Low-income employees may benefit from the simplicity of the new regime, with comparable tax outcomes.
Middle-income earners with moderate investments, such as health insurance or home loan interest, might find the old regime’s deductions more beneficial.
High-income earners with substantial investments in Section 80C or housing loans may find the old regime preferable for offsetting their higher incomes.
Tax calculators can provide a personalized assessment to help employees choose the most tax-efficient option for their financial situation.
The new regime impacts financial planning and budgeting, as salaried employees may need to adjust their investment strategies. Without incentives for traditional tax-saving options like PPF or ELSS, employees might seek alternative investments that offer higher returns, even without tax benefits. Employers may also adjust salary structures and benefits in response to the revised tax norms to retain and attract talent. For individuals, proactive and flexible planning will be essential in adapting to these changes.
Critics argue that removing exemptions discourages savings, potentially affecting long-term financial security. The dual-regime system has also created confusion, as individuals struggle to determine which regime offers more financial benefits. Proponents, however, claim that the simplified tax structure fosters compliance and reduces tax disputes, promoting fairness.
The new tax regime brings both opportunities and challenges for salaried employees. Lower-income earners and those who don’t rely on deductions may appreciate the simplicity and reduced rates. On the other hand, higher-income earners who benefit from deductions might find the old regime more advantageous. To make informed decisions, employees are advised to review their financial plans, explore alternative investments, and stay updated on any policy changes. In an evolving tax landscape, proactive planning and informed choices will be key to optimizing tax outcomes.
How can we help? *
