India’s Auditor Pulls Up Government For Not Doing GST Compliance Easier

India’s auditor has pulled up the government for failing to execute a “improved tax compliance regime” with the rollout of goods and services tax.

This is “one noteworthy area where the maximum capacity of GST rollout has not been accomplished”, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India said in its first review report of GST.

The auditor said that even following two years of GST rollout, a system approved input tax credit through an invoice coordinating framework, has not been implemented. Invoice coordinating system is used to match invoices issued by taxpayers, and their returns to check evasion.

The complexity of the return filing mechanism and technical glitches brought about the rollback of invoice matching, making the system inclined to input tax credit cheats, CAG said in its findings. “Without invoice coordinating and auto generation of discounts, evaluations on the whole, the visualized GST tax compliance system is non-functional.”

Invoice matching is the basic prerequisite that would yield the full advantages of this real tax change, the auditor said. It would ensure the tax incomes of both the Center and the states, and lead to legitimate settlement of incorporated goods and service tax, it said.

Absence of Coordination Among Departments

The review report by CAG said that suspension of key aspects of the system like invoice matching, changes presented in the GST system, point to lacking coordination among Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, and GST Network.

It also indicates disappointment evaluate the system enough before the rollout, the auditor said.

Revenue Dipped, Compliance Dropped

The development of indirect taxes for the central government slowed to 5.8 percent year-on year in financial year 2017-18, with the government’s revenue from goods and services taking a 10 percent dip, the auditor said.

Indirect taxes in 2016-17 developed 21.3 percent over the earlier year. “While it was expected that compliance would improve as the system would balance out, all returns being documented demonstrated a declining pattern of filing,” the report said.

The filing percentage of GSTR-1 returns—month to month sales—were less in contrast with the filing of GSTR-3B returns. The presentation of GSTR-3B has brought about filing of returns with input tax credit claims which couldn’t be confirmed, the report said.

Accumulations from integrated GST—collected on between inter state transactions—were developed dependent on Finance Commission’s suggestions, which was in repudiation of the IGST Act, the CAG said. This, as per the auditor, affected the circulation of funds to states on a totally different basis rather than “place of supply” idea as conceived in the IGST Act. The government additionally did not transfer Rs 6,466 crore of GST remuneration cess to the public acccount during 2017-18, the report said.

The auditor also found that IGST settlement reports—intended to empower sharing of IGST between central government and states and created dependent on the calculation that keeps running on GST IT system—were not being produced. This, it stated, was expected to non-usage of corresponding GST modules, similar to imports and appeals. Mistakes in the settlement algorithm, and limitation of the GSTR-3B return in catching all the data required for settlement, had a heading on the settlement of funds between the Center and the states, the auditor said.

The fragmented IGST ledgers were partially in charge of Rs 2.11 lakh crore of IGST balance staying agitated during 2017-18.

The auditor has also pulled GSTN for not taking due consideration developed and in testing of the system before its rollout.

Contact Certicom in case of any queries.