Firms may get the opportunity to raise prices after transferring GST cuts

Companies are allowed to raise prices of products and services according to their business cycle without dread of getting caught in the counter profiteering arrangement in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) law once they have passed on the advantage of tax rate cuts to customers, said a government official.

The explanation from the official, who knows about how the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) and its investigative arm work, comes when ambiguity in the law and the recent expansion of the profiteering watchdog’s residency just as an increment in penalty for violation have prompted worries that the pricing liberty of organizations stands curtailed.

Experts said that because of lack of rules on the best way to execute anti-profiteering arrangements in the Central GST Act, organizations don’t know to what extent they are relied upon to keep up a price after they diminish price to pass on the advantage of a tax reduction to customers. This is additionally troubling for organizations that have dealt with charges of profiteering for explicit periods previously. The law is silent on to what extent companies have to mantain the reduced prices after a tax rate cut. This open finished arrangement, in effect, brings about value organization, they said. Under GST law, not passing on the advantages of tax rate decrease or accessibility of input tax credits to customers by organizations and merchants adds up to profiteering.

The liberty to expand price according to the business cycle will come as a relief to organizations, particularly huge fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) makers that have confronted ‘profiteering’ charges under GST law.

“Whenever there is a decrease in GST rate, businesses need to pass on the advantage to customers right away. From there on, organizations are allowed to follow their cycle of price alterations as they esteem fit in accordance with market forces. There is no lock-in period at keeping up reduced prices,” said the main authority refered above, who spoke on state of obscurity. If a company has expanded costs of items in a specific month previously, that is a legitimate clarification at a price increment ensuing to reducing prices in accordance with a tax rate cut. Businesses, however, ought to be in a situation to protect themselves in case of a complaint, said the person.

Specialists said it may not be a simple assignment for businesses to defend price increments thinking about the complexities in the overall business condition and pricing. They said past price trends may demonstrate movement the two different ways and may not be adequate to legitimize a cost increase if there should be an occurrence of a profiteering investigation.

“Businesses may now and again need to build margins on a superior selling product to offset losses in other products. There is still an ambiguity on whether that expansion in margin for certain products would be satisfactory by the specialists as a justification for a price increment. Independently, industry has additionally been looking forward to detailed guidelines on computing the amount of advantage to be passed on and in specific, the length for which the reduced price is to be continued,” said EY tax partner Abhishek Jain.

The other factor that has got businesses stressed is the perpetual idea of the anti profiteering arrangement in the CGST Act in spite of the fact that the tenure of the NAA is defined. The arrangement which mandates prompt price goods and services and ventures similar with the tax cut, does not indicate a sun set statement. A second government official, who also talked on the state of anonymity, said that the anti profiteering arrangement might be administered by any assigned government authority or organization in a less detailed manner after NAA’s term finishes as the tax framework would have settled by at that point. The GST Council broadened the term of NAA by two years in June, which empowers it to keep on working till end of 2021. The Council had additionally in June chosen to let NAA force a punishment identical to 10% of the profiteered amount on the individuals who pocket the tax benefit implied for buyers.

Contact Certicom, Best GST consultants in Bangalore for any further queries.